site Het zal vaders een zorg zijnArchiefpagina van de site
"Het zál vaders een zorg zijn"

Zie de opmerkingen op de pagina archiefindex
Einde hongerstaking Len Miskulin

Len heeft zijn hongerstaking beeindigd: zijn laatste dagverslagen


zie ook tweede pagina met Nederlands/Engels persbericht
Nu al 46 dagen
Op 16 december 2000 stopte Len Miskulin met eten uit protest tegen het feit dat hij zijn kinderen niet kan ontmoeten. Op 30 januari 2001 was hij 45 dagen bezig. Hij voelt zich zwak, moe en koud. Lopen gaat nauwelijks meer. Hij weegt nu 52,5 kilo, 15,5 kilo minder als voor zijn  hongerstaking.  Niettemin lijkt Miskulin nog steeds vastbesloten om tot het einde door te gaan. Volgens een Nederlandse medische publikatie kent een hongerstaking rond de 40e dag meestal een 'keerpunt' daarna kan snel en onverwacht de terminale fase intreden. Dat Miskulin blijkbaar dag 45 nog behoorlijk aanspreekbaar haalde kan verband houden met het feit dat hij wel suiker en melk in zijn koffie neemt - aldus een geraadpleegde arts. Er zijn hongerstakingen die 70 tot 80 dagen duurden, maar 60 is gebruikelijker.  De huisarts die Miskulin begeleidt is tevens de huisarts van zijn ex. Nederlandse deskundigen bepleiten dat hongerstakers een vertrouwensarts nemen, maar in Engeland is dat een onbekend fenomeen. Miskulin doet zijn actie overigens  vanuit de woning waar hij alleen woont, hij wordt wel regelmatig bezocht door enkele vrienden. Afgezien van de organisatie Equal Parenting is de stilte van de zijde van Britse vader-organisaties oorverdovend.

Hunger strike references

 

Information in Spanish
Information in French

To view web updates go to:
http://familyroutes.its-magic.org/hunger or
http://members.brabant.chello.nl/~g.tenbroek/hunger/

all new information should be sent to:
webmaster@its-magic.org

Listserves for up-to-date information

Hunger for Justice listserve (main listserve)
HfJ@topica.com
For information on the list see: http://www.topica.com/lists/HfJ
To subscribe, send message to: HfJ-subscribe@topica.com
To unsubscribe, send message to: HfJ-unsubscribe@topica.com

Euromums&dads listserve (European - English language)
To Post a message, send it to: euro-dads@eGroups.com
To Subscribe, send a blank message to: euro-dads@eGroups.com
To Unsubscribe, send a blank message to: euro-dads-unsubscribe@eGroups.com

Freedom for Kids list (ffk - Canadian)
ffk@sympatico.ca

Shared Parenting listserve
http://www.egroups.com/list/sharedparenting

hijosypadres listserve (Spanish)
to post a message: hijosypadres@eGroups.com
To Subscribe, send a blank message to: hijosypadres@eGroups.com
To Unsubscribe, send a blank message to: hijosypadres-unsubscribe@eGroups.com

 

Len Miskulin, from the UK, is now into the 30th day of his hunger strike to see and be a father to his children.

Clayton Giles, a fourteen-year old boy from Canada, is also on hunger strike, demanding that his voice be listened to in decisions over custody.

Both are demanding respect for their human family rights from the courts that are ignoring them.

web addresses containing information:
http://lenmiskulin.equalparenting.org/
http://www.equalparenting.org/
http://www.backlash.com//content/gender/2000/12dec00/lem1200.html
http://www.backlash.com//content/gender/2000/12dec00/hunger.pdf
http://www.mamut.com/homepages/United_Kingdom/2/10/childrescue/subdet18.htm
http://www.ukmm.org.uk/notices/hunger.htm
http://netvote.homestead.com/shock11~ns4.html
http://www.richel.org/brokenlink/get_article.php3?id=1959
http://www.dadsaustralia.com/


Len Miskulin

130 Hanson Drive
Loughton Essex IG10 2EA
UK
Phone: +044 020-8508 6980
Fax: +044 020-8529 9948
email: jafp@talk21.com

To ask for representations to be made to the Croatian Govt. or to obtain details of your local Croatian organisation
(Len Miskulin, UK resident, is from Croatia)
send an email to:
Ivan Curman, President
Canadian Croatia Congress
Burnaby, BC Canada
icurman@crowc.org

to make representations to UK missions abroad, check
UK Overseas Missions
http://www.fco.gov.uk/directory/posts.asp

to make representations to amnesty international, which normally chooses to ignore human rights abuse when committed against parents:
amnestyis@amnesty.org

ex-fathers' website
http://www.glen-net.ca/ex-fathers
Hunger strike Info on message boards:
http://www.canadian.net/~fact/wwwboard.html
Lloyd Gorling
email: kalypso@glen-net.ca


Clayton Giles

Clayton Giles is a fourteen-year-old Canadian boy who has been on hunger strike since January 1st 2001 in order to demand that the courts change custody to his father, with whom he resides. Clayton's wish to have two parents has been ignored for many years by the court system.

Eric Giles - Clayton's father
Marnie Harrison - Clayton's mother

Clayton Giles' website, including voluminous message board and background information
http://www.legalkids.homestead.com/
His Hunger Strike Journal
http://www.legalkids.homestead.com/strike.html

 

A fifteen-year-old boy from Ontario, Canada, Kody Sippel, has started his own website as a result of Clayton's action

Kody Sippel Sunday, 1/14/01, 11:17
I am opening the Ontario chapter of Legal Kids. Ontario Chapter
E-mail: yoda964@hotmail.com
http://www.legalkidsontario.homestead.com/
Welcome to the Ontario chapter of Legal Kids This Site is currently under construction. My name is Kody Sippel and I am 15 years old. After talking to Clayton Giles I have started this site for kids and teenagers whose parents are devorcing in Ontario.

Licia Corbella, editor of the Calgary Sun, has written several pieces on the Giles case, one in favour, one against, provoking considerable reactions on Clayton's message boards.
She can be reached at 403-250-4129
or by e-mail at licia.corbella@cal.sunpub.com. Her columns appear Tuesday,
Wednesday, Thursday, Saturday and Sunday.
Letters to the editor should be sent to callet@sunpub.com.
Calgary Sun website: http://www.calgarysun.com/


Another hunger strike for which little information is available:

Steve Blake, president of R-KIDS of Minnesota, also began a hunger strike on December 23rd.
http://www.backlash.com/content/gender/2000/12dec00/sblk1200.html

 


15 January, 2001 22:04

Dear All,
 
This email is a request to you all to help in making people aware of what is happening here in the UK in terms of family court censorship.
 
It seems that there may be very real attempts to censor Len and prevent any knowledge of what he is doing from reaching the public - effectively preventing people from even knowing he is on hunger strike. He and anyone else in the UK publicising information about his hunger strike could be under threat of prison sentences and/or seizure of their goods, which I presume includes computers, if it is believed that they will disseminate this story further.
 
This puts people supporting him in the UK in a very awkward position. It may be that if the British and foreign press are to be made aware of what is happening, it is up to you to get the news out - some of you will be in possession of the relevant information already, and, if not in the UK, can disseminate it further at your discretion. British courts, in fact any authoritarian power, does not necessarily state its threats in unambiguous language, so the courts will phrase things in such a way as to maintain an appearance of altruism, by for instance referring to a certain newspaper article and the information contained therein ... Nevertheless, courts do seize goods and put people in prison on just such civil liberties issues - the threat is not an idle one.
 
The case has particular relevance to the British Press at the moment, as they are still stinging from the recent legal decision to ban them from publishing the new identities and locations of the two boys, now eighteen, who at the age of 10 killed Jamie Bulger. Whatever one's opinions on the morality of this, the decision to suppress the press in this way represents a significant precedent. Attempts to prevent disclosure of Len's hunger strike follow in the same vein.
 
You will be aware that there are presently two sites linking information on the hunger strikes in Canada and in the UK. These are:

http://familyroutes.its-magic.org/hunger/ or
http://members.brabant.chello.nl/~g.tenbroek/hunger/

If active moves are made to serve injunctions on people diffusing information, then only the second site may be available.

I hope and trust that some of you can pursue this matter in the manner you see fit, and prepare any information you feel appropriate using the above information and any information shared between you.

 

Yours sincerely,

 

x

 =================

copy of order (edited not to disclose names of other parties)

the father will be in court tomorrow about this and will ask for an adjournment
 
 
 
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE FAMILY DIVISION

BETWEEN

[mother, name blanked] And [father, name blanked]

ORDER

CASENO: FD001F00014
Applicant

Respondent

Upon hearing Counsel for the Applicant on an ex parte application before HHJ Tyrer (sitting as a High Court Judge) on the 9'" January 2001

And Upon Counsel for the Applicant undertaking to have sworn the Applicant's application today,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

An injunction is hereby granted restraining until further order, any person including the Respondent, [name blanked], (whether by himself or by his servants or agents or otherwise or in the case of a company whether by its directors or officers, servants or agents or otherwise howsoever) from:

a.   Publishing in any book, magazine or newspaper, or broadcasting in any sound or television broadcast, or by means of any cable or satellite programme service, or web site or internet site, or poster or othenvise:
i.   The name and address of the children namely: [name blanked] (DOB [blanked]) and [name blanked] (DOB [blanked]) See schedule set out below.
ii.   Any  school  or recreational  institution  at  which  the  children  are attending in particular [school identity blanked].
iii.   The above mentioned Applicant and/or Respondent parents of the said children being the persons whose names and addresses are set out in the schedule hereto.

b.  Any picture being or including a picture of either (i) the child or (ii) either of the parents.

c.  from publishing, re-publishing or disseminating to any other person or body in whole or part the information contained in an article printed by the said newspaper on Thursday 28th December 2000 concerning the said parents or children.

d.  Soliciting any information relating to the child from:
    i.  The child
    ii.  From the staff or the pupils  of the school or students of the recreational or educational institution that the children attend.
    iii. From the Petitioner
    iv. From the Respondent

e.  notwithstanding the provisions of s12(2) of the Administration of Justice Act 1960 as amended but without prejudice to paragraph 2 below including in any publication of the text or the summary of the whole of this order any of the matters referred to herein.

IN EACH CASE in a manner calculated to lead to the identification:
(a) in the case of the child, of the child either as being the subject of proceedings before the court, or the child of a parent on hunger strike (reportedly during the course of FLA 1996 and/or CA 1989 or other private law proceedings,)
(b) in the case of any school or educational or recreational institution, such educational or recreational institution as being one at which the children attend.
(c) In the case of the Petitioner as being the spouse/former spouse of the Respondent and as being the parent with whom the children reside.

PROVIDING THAT NOTHING in this order shall of itself prevent any person:
(i) publishing any particulars of or information relating to any part of the proceedings before any court other than a court sitting in private.
(ii) soliciting information relating to the child in the course of or for the purpose of the exercise by the person soliciting such information of any duty or function authorised by statute or by any court of competent jurisdiction .

Copies of this order endorsed with a penal notice be served by the Applicant:
a. on such newspapers and sound or television broadcasting or cable or satellite programme service the Applicant may think fit. In each facsimile transmission first addressed to the editor of a newspaper or senior news editor in the case of a broadcasting or satellite programme service.
b. on the Respondent and such other persons as the Applicant may think fit in each case by personal service.

AND the parties and any person affected by the injunction in above are to be at liberty to apply with at least 2 days written notice to the Applicants solicitors.
 
3. The Official Solicitor be invited to consider acting on behalf of the children.
 
4. This matter do return for further hearing on 16th January 2001 at 10:30am. (with a time estimate of 1 hour) .
 
5. Costs reserved.

Take notice that if you neglect to obey this order you may be held in contempt of court and liable to imprisonment or sequestration of your assets.

                          SCHEDULE :
The children are: [name blanked] (DOB [blanked]) and [name blanked] (DOB [blanked]) residing at [address blanked] The Applicant is [name blanked] residing at [address blanked]

The Respondent is [name blanked] residing at [address blanked]
 
===================
 
copy of newspaper article referred to in order, names elided
 
The following article was printed in the Daily Mail (UK) Thursday 28th. December 2000.

YOU'VE never heard of Len Miskulin, but this 49-year-old engineer for British Telecom is on so severe a hunger strike that his friends and relatives are beginning to fear for his health.

 But Len refuses to listen to their pleas to eat because he thinks it is his only chance of seeing his sons, Matthew, ten, and Steven, seven.

 For Len is one of countless thousands of divorced men who are prevented from seeing their children by their former wives. Very often their wife has left against their wishes but it is the women we traditionally pity. Only now is society beginning to appreciate that there are male victims, too.

 They, like Len, will have spent Christmas alone. For all, it was the bleakest day of their year.

 'I miss my sons dreadfully and the worst of it is that I did nothing to deserve them being taken away from me,' says Len, who lives in Loughton Essex. Indeed he did not.

 On July 8 this year, [first name blanked], his partner of 13 years, walked out on him, taking their sons with her. He later discovered that she was having an affair with an older man.  Although [son's first name blanked] and [other son's first name blanked] are with [mother's first name blanked] at her parents' house in [suburb name blanked], only four miles away from his home, Len has not seen his sons since October 5.

His wife has taken out a court order forbidding him from contacting them until access is agreed legally.

Len is beside himself with grief and, as a mark of the extremity of his feelings, has been on hunger strike since Saturday, December 16.

 As the rest of us tucked into turkey and trimmings, Len had nothing.

 It was, he insists, torture, but he is determined to prove his point.

 'I think I have been treated with gross unfairness and I want to draw attention to the fact that the legal system is as biased as it is against fathers.

 'I loved [mother's first name blanked] with all my heart and the 13 years we spent together were the happiest of my life,' he says, his eyes filling with tears.

 'I raised those boys, loved them played with them, changed their nappies and got up for them in the night. I was just as much of a carer and parent to them as Helen but suddenly she has the power to prevent me from seeing them.

 'I cannot believe that the courts will not let me be with them. It is so unfair.'

 A maelstrom of emotion betrayal, loneliness, despair has shaken this normally quiet man to his very core. He truly cannot cope with the fact that the mother of his children has chosen to destroy their family and he is, he admits, scarcely thinking rationally.

 'I miss my sons so much. Everything in my life is in ruins and I have decided to go on hunger strike to try to show Helen and the courts just how desperate I am.

 'A lot of men would just accept this situation, but I cannot, I simply cannot.'

NEEDLESS to say, his Christmas Day was bleak alone at the former family home with just water to sustain him. Even if one does not condone the extremity of his actions one cannot help but sympathise with him.

 Len has been e-mailed by fathers in similar situations from all over Britain and as far afield as America, Canada and New Zealand.

 Most, naturally, advise him to stop the hunger strike and pursue his campaign by less drastic means, but, above all, the strength of feeling his case has provoked is one that cannot be gainsayed.

 As one man — David from Liverpool—wrote to Len yesterday: 'I, too, spent Christmas on my own with nothing but the television and a microwave meal for company, while my daughters were Just ten miles away but unable to see me.

 'I wish you the very best of luck. It's time people realised that men have feelings, too.'

 Whether Len's hunger strike is successful remains to be seen. What cannot be denied, however IS that, in these days of soaring divorce rates,

Christmas is, for many, no longer a straightforward day of family celebration. Indeed, for Len and many other men like him it was one of the most difficult experiences they have ever faced as a father.

 The agony of divorce and its aftermath has been well documented from the point of view of the wives and children involved, but all too often men have been forgotten.

 Traditionally, reluctant to speak out about their feelings of loss and abandonment, society is happy to turn a blind eye to their anguish.

HOWEVER, increasingly, divorced fathers are beginning to speak out about their pain at being separated from their children—particularly at this time of year, when the prospect of spending the festive season alone is almost too painful to bear.

 Three years ago, Tyrone Rajack 37, a successful banker in the Treasury Department of Lloyds Bank, spent his first Christmas away from his then three-year-old son, Mathew, after his wife left him for another man.

He admits now that he came within an ace of committing suicide on his lonely Christmas evening slumped in front of the television.

 'I'd had dinner with my parents, then went home to a cold, empty house. Everyone l knew seemed to be spending the day with a partner and their children.

 'I'm normally a cheerful, outgoing person but that evening I hit rock bottom.

 'I sat there watching the jolly family programmes on television feeling worse and worse, helping myself repeatedly to a bottle of Baileys.

 'At three in the morning I was still sitting there, feeling worse than ever, desperately missing my wife and son. We'd had so much going for us—a lovely house, good jobs and a beautiful baby boy.

 I'd thought we had the perfect life but, unknown to me, my wife was having an affair with a much older, wealthier work colleague.

 'When she'd said she was leaving I did everything to persuade her to stay but my pleas fell on deaf ears. Later, when I found out about the affair, it suddenly all made sense.

 'Everything I'd worked for in the 13 years Susan and I were together lay in tatters and that Christmas Day it felt as if I would never get over it.

 'I went into the bathroom and picked up a family-sized tub of paracetamol and brought it into the living room.

 'The only thing that stopped me swallowing the lot was the photograph of my son on the shelf beside me. He seemed to be looking into my eyes, and his arms seemed to be reaching towards me. As I looked into the face I loved so much, I realised I had a duty to pull myself together.

 'I picked up the photograph and took it to bed with me. The next morning I woke up feeling tired and hungover, but, as I looked once again at the photograph of my son, I also felt profoundly glad to be alive.

 'Even if it only meant seeing him once a year, that was enough to keep me going.'

FROM the minute Tyrone's wife left him, she was reluctant to allow him access to their son. As relations soured between the couple still further, Mathew's visits dwindled from twice a week to once a fortnight, with Tyrone barred from speaking to him on the telephone.  Tyrone felt he had no option but to resort to legal action and the couple now communicate only through solicitors' letters.  After a bitter legal battle it was finally agreed this year that Tyrone could see Mathew on alternate weekends and Monday evenings with four full weeks a year access and every other Christmas.  This year was his first December 25 with his son in four years and he was determined it would be perfect.

 He shopped for and cooked a full Christmas dinner for Mathew and eight other relatives and even banned television for the day, he was so determined to wring every ounce of pleasure out of being with his son. 'I wanted this to be the most perfect Christmas ever for Mathew. He's six years old now, just at the age when Father Christmas seems real and everything is completely magical.  'I wanted to give him a day he'll look back on and remember for the whole of his life and I think I did. We played old-fashioned board games and charades and the look on his face when he opened his present—a soldier's dressing-up outfit—will stay with me for the rest of the year.

 'But though the day was a wonderful one I could not help but dread having to hand him back to my wife again on Boxing Day, and, when the time came, it was all I could do not to cry.

 'As I watched them drive away I thought back to that dreadful Christmas three years ago and cursed the misery we have all been put through.

 'People assume men don't care about their children as much as mothers do but that's simply not true. I'd lay down my life for Mathew if necessary.

 'That's why I had to fight for access. Standing up before the judge and trying to convince him I was a good father was nothing short of humiliating but it was my only option. Luckily, the outcome was a fair one.'

 Tyrone has managed to use the law to enforce reasonable access to his son but many men are not so fortunate.

 Another father who spent a lonely Christmas was engineer Fairless Masterman, 47, who lives in a smart mansion block in Maida Vale, West London.

 His daughter, Oceana, 11, lives in Wisconsin, U.S. with her American mother Dennison, 36, and her second husband.

 Like Tyrone, Fairless did not want to get divorced and says that he and his wife split at her instigation after three years of marriage.

 There was no one else involved but the couple had, he says now simply grown apart. Since then he has made huge efforts and sacrifices to stay in touch with his daughter.

 'I telephone every week and talk to both her and her mother and we have come to an arrangement by which Oceana spends most of every school holiday with me here in England.

 'I was working as a engineer designing the Concorde flight control system and earning £1,000 a week when we divorced, but I changed to become a sound engineer—something much less lucrative and low-key—so that I could take large chunks of time off to look after Oceana when she visits.  'It's a reasonably amicable arrangement, as I've made a great effort to be civilised and keep all lines of communication open.

BUT the hard facts are that Oceana cannot be in two places at once at Christmas. I accept that she cannot be with me but it doesn't make the day itself any easier.

 'My mother is 82 and has just been through a course of chemotherapy, so is very frail.

Obviously she misses her granddaughter, too, and there is nothing I would have liked more than for Oceana to be with her this year.

 'As it was, the two of us spent a lonely day watching television. Last year I invited nine friends and relatives round to give Oceana a big, merry, family Christmas and we had a wonderful day. This year the contrast was marked, to say the least.

 'The sad truth is that a family break-up is like a car crash. The damage has been done and all that you can do is pick up the pieces and make the best of what is left.

 'My daughter knows my thoughts are always with her, even if I cannot be. But, the truth is, I have to live with the inevitable fact that she will be damaged by what we, her parents, have done.

 'I am convinced it is far better for a child to grow up, as I did, with two parents who are together. I can't even begin to imagine what it would have been like to be allowed only to spend Christmas with one of them.'

 Speaking to Len, Tyrone and Fairless about their childless Christmasses, the overwhelming emotion is one of sadness and loss.

 Their stories provide a harsh lesson, if one were needed, that there is no such thing as a damage-free divorce. All three men speak in terms of bewilderment and shock about their wives' decisions to leave and all wish they had been given more of a chance to rescue their marriages.

 But, most of all, they speak of simply wanting to be with their children.

 
 


home site het zál vaders een zorg zijn inhoudsopgave colofon tips & citaat mail links site zoekmachine en surftips

Logo Beeldrecht
Last Updated http://vaderseenzorg.nl/oost.html : zie ook de andere pagina's